Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Muawiyah and Abusing Imam Ali (A.S)

What the Holy Prophet(S.A.W.) said about those who fight, hate, or abuse his Ahlul-Bayt
The Messenger of Allah said:
"Loving Ali is the sign of belief, and hating Ali is the sign of
hypocrasy."
Sunni references:
- Sahih Muslim, v1, p48;
- Sahih Tirmidhi, v5, p643;
- Sunan Ibn Majah, v1, p142;
- Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal v1, pp 84,95,128
- Tarikh al-Kabir, by al-Bukhari (the author of Sahih), v1, part 1, p202
- Hilyatul Awliya', by Abu Nu'aym, v4, p185
- Tarikh, by al-Khateeb al-Baghdadi, v14, p462
This tradition of Prophet was popular to the extent that some of the
companions used to say:
"We recognized the hypocrites by their hatred of Ali."
Sunni references:
- Fada'il al-Sahaba, by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v2, p639, Tradition #1086
- al-Istiab, by Ibn Abd al-Barr, v3, p47
- al-Riyad al-Nadirah, by al-Muhib al-Tabari, v3, p242
- Dhakha'ir al-Uqba, by al-Muhib al-Tabari, p91
Also Muslim in his Sahih narrated on the authority of Zirr that:
Ali (RA) said: By him who split up the seed and created something
living, the Apostle (may peace and blessing be upon him) gave me a
promise that no one but a believer would love me, and none but a
hypocrite would nurse grudge against me.
- Sahih Muslim, English version, Chapter XXXIV, p46, Tradition #141
Abu Huraira narrated:
The Prophet (S.A.W.)looked toward Ali, al-Hasan, al-Husain, and
Fatimah, and said: "I am in the state of war with those who will fight
you, and in the state of peace with those who are peaceful to you."
Sunni references:
(1) Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v5, p699
(2) Sunan Ibn Majah, v1, p52
(3) Fada'il al-Sahaba, by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v2, p767, Tradition #1350
(4) al-Mustadrak, by al-Hakim, v3, p149
(5) Majma' al-Zawa'id, by al-Haythami, v9, p169
(6) al-Kabir, by Tabarani, v3, p30, also in al-Awsat
(7) Jamius Saghir, by al-Ibani, v2, p17
(8) Tarikh, by al-Khateeb al-Baghdadi, v7, p137
(9) Sawai'q al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, Ch. 11, section 1, p221
(10) Talkhis, by al-Dhahabi, v3, p149
(11) Dhakha'ir al-Uqba, by al-Muhib al-Tabari, p25
(12) Mishkat al-Masabih, by Khatib al-Tabrizi, English Version, Tdadition #6145
(13) Others such as Ibn Habban, etc.
It is the well-known fact in the history that Muawiyah fought Imam Ali
(A.S.). And based on the above tradition of the Prophet(S.A.W.) the
Prophet has declared war on Muawiyah. How can we still love a person whom
the Prophet has declared war on him?
The Messenger of Allah said:
"Whoever hurts Ali, has hurt me"
Sunni references:
- Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v3, p483
- Fada'il al-Sahaba, by Ahmad Hanbal, v2, p580, Tradition #981
- Majma' al-Zawa'id, by al-Haythami, v9, p129
- al-Sawa'iq al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, Ch. 11, section 1, p263
- Ibn Habban, Ibn Abd al-Barr, etc.
The Messenger of Allah said:
"Whoever reviles/curses Ali, has reviled/cursed me"
Sunni reference:
- al-Mustadrak, by al-Hakim, v3, p121, who mentioned this tradition is
Authentic.
- Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v6, p323
- Fada'il al-Sahaba, by Ahmad Hanbal, v2, p594, Tradition #1011
- Majma' al-Zawa'id, by al-Haythami, v9, p130
- Mishkat al-Masabih, English version, Tradition #6092
- Tarikh al-Khulafa, by Jalaluddin al-Suyuti, p173
- and many others such as Tabarani, Abu Ya'la, etc.
Muawiyah Instituting the curse of Imam Ali (A.S.)
Muawiyah not only fought Imam Ali, he cursed Imam Ali as well. Furthermore,
he did force/make everybody to curse Ali (A.S.). To prove it, we begin with
Sahih Muslim:
Narrated Sa'd Ibn Abi Waqqas:
Muawiyah, the son of Abu Sufyan, give order to Sa'd, and told him:
"What prevents you that you are refraining from cursing Abu Turab
(nickname of Ali)?" Sa'd replied: "Don't you remember that the Prophet
said three things about (the virtue of) Ali? So I will never curse
Ali."
Sunni reference: Sahih Muslim, Chapter of Virtues of Companions, Section of
Virtues of Ali, Arabic, v4, p1871, Tradition #32.
The above tradition, by the way, indicates that Muawiyah was surprised why
Sa'd does not follow his order of cursing Ali, like others do. This shows
that cursing Ali was a habit (Sunnah) for people at that time. Who made
this Sunnah? Was it Ali, or those who fought him? Now, who fought against
Ali? Wasn't he Muawiyah (the beloved companion of Wahhabis)? So this
implies that Muawiyah did innovate that habit (cursing Ali as Sunnah).
Below is more references in Sahih Muslim about Sunnah cursing Imam Ali
(AS), to prove that people were urged/forced to curse Ali in public,
otherwise they would face a costly sentence. It is narrated on the
authority of Abu Hazim that:
The Governor of Medina who was one of the members of the house of
Marwan called Sahl Ibn Sa'd, and ordered him to curse Ali. But Sahl
refused to do so. The governor said: "If you don't want to curse Ali,
just say God curse Abu Turab (the nickname of Ali)." Sahl said: "Ali
did not like any name for himself better than Abu Turab, and Ali used
to become very happy when somebody would call him Abu Turab."
Sunni reference: Sahih Muslim, Chapter of Virtues of Companions, Section of
Virtues of Ali, Arabic version, v4, p1874, Tradition #38.
Cursing Imam Ali (AS) was an order from the beginning of Muawiyah's reign
for 65 years. He was Umar Ibn Abdil Aziz (may Allah be easy with him) who
canceled this order after more than half a century. Some historians even
believe that the Umayyah descendants themselves killed (poisoned) Umar Ibn
Abdil Aziz, because he changed their Sunnah, one of which was cursing Ali.
(See the Sunni book entitled "History of the Saracens," by Amir Ali,
Chapter X, pp 126-127).
One of the ugliest innovations that started during the reign of Muawiyah
was that Muawiyah himself, and through his order to his Governors, they
used to insult Imam Ali (AS) during the Sermons in the Mosques. This was
even done on the pulpit of the mosque of the Prophet in Medina in front of
the grave of the Prophet Muhammad (May Allah bless him and his Progeny),
so that even the dearest Companions of the Prophet (S.A.W.), and Imam Ali
(A.S.), his family and his near relatives used to hear these swears with
their ears.
Sunni references :
- History of al-Tabari, v4, p188
- History of Ibn Kathir, v3, p234; v4, p154
- al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah, v8, p259; v9, p80
On insulting Ali Ibn Abi Talib and cursing him during the Umayah period
starting in Muawiyah's reign, it is reported that:
"Ali Ibn Abi Talib (A.S.) was cursed on the pulpits (manabir) of the
east and west...", during the time of Muawiyah.
Sunni reference: Mu'jam al-Buldan, al-Hamawi, v5, p38
In her letter, Umm Salama, the wife of the Prophet (S.A.W.) wrote to
Muawiyah: "...You are cursing Allah and His messenger on your minbar,
and that is because you are cursing Ali Ibn Abi Talib and whomever
loves him, and I am a witness that Allah and His messengerloved him."
But no one paid any attention to what she said.
Sunni reference: al-Aqd al-Fareed, v2, p300
"That it was in the days of Bani Umayyah, more than seventy thousand
minbar (in mosques) upon which they cursed Ali Ibn Abi-Talib, in some
of what Muawiyah made a Sunnah for them."
Sunni references:
- Rabeea' al-Abrar, al-Zamakhshari
- al-Hafidh Jalaluddin al-Suyuti
al-Shaikh Ahmad al-Hafdhi al-Shafi'i, composed 9 verses of poetry expanding
on what al-Suyuti has reported in the previous quote, I translated the
first three verses:
And Shaikh al-Suyuti told:
That it was what they made into a "Sunnah".
Seventy thousand mibar plus ten
from the top of which they cursed Haydara (Ali).
And next to this the greatest (sins) look small,
but blame ought to be directed.
Let us now see the opinion of the son of Yazid about his father and
his grandfather, who was the witness from within the royal family!
...When (Yazid) offered the kingdom (throne) to his son, Muawiyah the
second, in order that the flag of caliphate continues to wave in the
house of Abi Sufyan!!
After his death, Muawiyah the second, gathered the people on a well
known day, he stood in them preaching, he said:
"My grandfather Muawiyah stripped the command from those who deserved
it, and from one who is more justified of it, for his relation to the
Messenger of Allah and his being first in Islam, and that is Ali Ibn
Abi Talib, he (Muawiyah) took over it by your help as you are fully
aware."
"Then following it my father Yazid wore the command after him, and he
did not deserve it. He quarreled with the son of the daughter of the
Messenger of Allah, and by that he shortened his own life... He rode
his whim and hope left him behind." Then he cried and continued:
"Surely, the greatest problems of us is our knowledge of his bad
behavior and his awful ending, and that he killed the progeny (Itrah)
of the Messenger of Allah, and he permitted drinking alcohol, and he
fought in the sanctuary of Mecca, and destroyed the Ka'ba."
"And I am not the one who is dressing up for your command, nor the one
to be responsible for your followers... You choose for yourselves..!!"
Sunni references:
- Khulafaa al-Rasool, by Khalid Mohammed Khalid, p531 (The above quote
includes author's punctuation.)
- Sawaiq al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, end of Ch. 11, pp 336
Muawiyah and Yazid murdering Imam al-Hasan Ibn Ali (AS) by poison,
reported by many, here are a few Sunni references:
1. Tathkarat al-Khawass, Sibt ibn al-Jawzi al-Hanafi, pp 191-194.
2. Ibn Abd al-Barr, in his "Seera"
3. al-Suddi
4. al-Sha'bi
5. Abu Nu'aym
No reference is required that Yazid and his gang murdered the other son of
Ali Ibn Abi Talib, the grandson of the Messenger of Allah (PBUH): Imam al-
Husain (AS) along with 70+ of his family members and loyals.
More Sunni references on the mischief of Muawiyah:
It is reported from Abdullah, son of Ahmad Ibn Hanbal saying:
I asked my father about Ali and Muawiyah. He (Ahmad Ibn Hanbal)
answered: "Know that Ali had a lot of enemies who tried hard to find a
fault in him, but they found it not. As such, they joined a man (i.e.,
Muawiyah, as given in the footnotes) who verily fought him battled
him, and they praised him (Muawiyah) extravagantly setting a snare for
themselves for him.
Sunni references:
- al-Toyuriyyat, by al-Salafi, from Abdullah Ibn Ahmad Hanbal
- al-Sawa'iq al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar, Ch. 9, section 4, p197
- History of the Caliphs, by Jalaluddin al-Suyuti, English version, p202
al-Tabari reported:
When Muawiyah Ibn Abi Sufyan put al-Mughairah Ibn Shubah in charge of
Kufah in Jumada 41 (September 2- October 30, 661), he summoned him.
After praising and glorifying God, he said:
"Now then, indeed a forbearing person has been admonished in the
past... The wise might do what you want without instruction. Although
I have wanted to advise you about many things, I left them alone,
trusting in your discernment of what pleases me, what helps my regime
and what sets my subjects [raiyyah] on the right path. I would
continue to advise you about a quality of yours- do not refrain from
abusing Ali and criticizing him, not from asking God's mercy upon
Uthman and His forgiveness for him. Continue to shame the companions
of Ali, keep at a distance, and don't listen to them. Praise the
faction of Uthman, bring them near, and listen to them."
Sunni reference: History of Tabari, English version, events of year 51 AH,
Execution of Hujr Ibn Adi, v18, pp 122-123
Also:
The Messenger of Muawiyah then came to them with orders to release six
and to kill eight, telling them:
We have been ordered to let you disavow Ali and curse him. If you do
so, we shall release you, and if you refuse, we shall kill you.
Sunni reference: History of Tabari, English version, events of year 51 AH,
v18, p149
More from Sahih Muslim:
Allah's messenger (PBUH) said to Ammar: "A group of rebels would kill
you."
- Sahih Muslim, English version, v4, chapter MCCV, Tradition #6968
Also:
Umm Salama narrated that Allah's messenger (may peace be upon him)
said: "A band of rebels would kill Ammar."
- Sahih Muslim, English version, v4, chapter MCCV, Tradition #6970
Do you know that Ammar, the great companion of the Prophet was martyred in
the battle of Siffin by Muawiyah soldiers, at the age of ninety-three? Is
it clear, now, that The gang of Muawiyah were rebels? Do you know what is
the sentence of rebels (Taghee) mentioned in Quran?
It is interesting to see that the English translator of Sahih Muslim (Abdul
Hamid Siddiqui) has written in the footnote of the above traditions that:
This narration is clearly indicative of the fact that in the conflict
between Hadrat Ali and his opponents, Hadrat Ali was on the right as
Ammar Ibn Yasir was killed in the Battle of Siffin fighting in the
camp of Hadrat Ali. (Footnote of Sahih Muslim, English version, v4,
p1508).
Do I need to comment?!
The very first head that was amputated from the body during the Islamic
period was of Ammar Ibn Yasir (RA). Ahmad Ibn Hanbal in his Musnad
narrates a tradition which has also been mentioned in the
Tabaqat of Ibn Sa'd, and is as follows:
"In the Battle of Sifin, when the head of Ammar Yasir (RA) was cut
off and taken to Muawiyya, two people were arguing over it, each one
claimed that he had killed Ammar."
Sunni references:
- Musnad Ahmad (Pub. in Dar al-Maarif, Egypt 1952), Tradition #6538, #6929
- Tabaqat, by Ibn Sa'd, v3, p253
Finally, I would like to finish this article by the following two
traditions:
The Messenger of Allah (S.A.W.) said: If one while praying between
the Rukn and Maqam (near Ka'bah) and fasting, dies but with the hate
of the family of Muhammad, he will enter the Fire. And he who abuses
my Ahlul-Bayt is verily an apostate and is driven out of Islam. And he
who inflicts pain on my progeny upon him is the curse of Allah. And he
who hurts me by hurting my progeny has verily hurt/angered Allah.
Certainly Allah has made Paradise forbidden to he who does injustice
to my Ahlul-Bayt, or kills them, or assists against them, or abuses
them.
Sunni reference: al-Sawa'iq al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, Ch. 11,
p357 who said this tradition is authentic.
Also:
The Messenger of Allah said: "Whoever curses (or verbally abuses) Ali,
he has, in fact, cursed me, and whoever has cursed me, he has cursed
Allah, and whoever has cursed Allah, then Allah will throw him into
the Hell-fire."
Sunni reference: Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v6, p33
Thus Muawiyah and his associates were, in fact, cursing the Prophet
(S.A.W.), and by cursing the Prophet, they were cursing Allah (SWT), and
by cursing Allah, they shall enter the hellfire! By Allah, they will be
asked to account for what they've said! That is a promise by Allah (SWT)
which He shall not break!
"And do not think Allah to be heedless of what the unjust do; He only
respites them upto a day on which the eyes will be fixedly open."
(Quran 14:42)

Monday, May 6, 2013

Hujr bin Adi ( R.A.) , a Companion of Prophet Muhammad(sawa) Grave desecrated by Salafis in Syria

The Shrine of Hajar bin Adi is located 12 miles away from Damascus, Syria, at a place called 'Adra' or Azra. Hajar was a faithful companion of Imam Ali. Muawiyah bin Abu Sufyan got him brutally killed for his alliance with Ali. سيد حسن الكشميري سلسلة مع الصالحين حجر بن عدي1

Hazrat Hujr bin Adi ( A.R.) was killed by Muawiya ( lanatulla alaihe)

Shahadat Hazrat Hujr Ibn Adi RA - Moulana Sadiq Hasan - Urdu

Hujr ibn Adi (Arabic: حجر بن عدي ‎) (d.660) was a supporter of Ali ibn Abi talib,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hujr_ibn...
http://www.answering-ansar.org/answer..

MU‘AWIYA IN THE EYES OF LATER MUSLIMS

Mu‘awiya’s calculated reserve no doubt contributed to his ambiguous place in the Muslim imagination, but that is only the beginning. The real problem is that he did not fit neatly into the moral categories which later Muslims devised to evaluate a person’s religious standing – indeed, he subverted them – and so they could never quite decide what to make of him. It must be admitted that for two broad religio-political groupings, the Kharijites and Shi’ites, there was no ambivalence at all. For them, he was a figure of unmitigated evil, a man who knowingly and cynically worked to destroy the new covenant established by Muhammad and to return the world to the ignorant brutishness of the Jahiliyya, the time before Islam. The ‘Abbasid caliphs, who overthrew the Umayyad dynasty that he had put in power and who did everything they could to blacken its memory, publicly condemned him and his seed. 

The first ‘Abbasid, Abu al-‘Abbas al-Saffah (749–754), set the tone in his accession speech in Kufa: 
Woe, woe to the Banu Harb b. Umayyah and the Banu Marwan!1 In their space and time they preferred the ephemeral to the eternal, the transient abode to the everlasting one. Crime them obsessed; God’s creatures they oppressed; women forbidden to them they possessed, all honour grieving and by sin deceiving. They tyrannised God’s servants by their deport with evil custom where they sought disport, themselves with vice’s burdens decked and their idolatry unchecked, at management of every fault most lively, cheerful; withal to race on error’s course not fearful; God’s purpose in respiting sin not comprehending and trusting they had tricked Him by pretending! God’s severity came on them like a night raid when they were sleeping and at dawn they were only legends. They were torn all to tatters and thus may an oppressive people perish! [Tabari, vol. XXVII, pp. 155–6] 
Invective of this sort was repeated more than once in the reigns of al-Saffah’s immediate successors. Systematic public campaigns to vilify Mu‘awiya and the entire Umayyad clan, to label them not only as hypocrites and corrupt, bloody tyrants but even as apostates, were planned by the caliphs al-Ma’mun (813–833) and al-Mu’tadid (892–902), long after Mu‘awiya and the Umayyads could possibly have threatened ‘Abbasid power. Neither caliph went ahead with the project, since the political fallout was unpredictable. The unpublished decrees of al-Ma’mun and al-Mu’tadid were no doubt aimed less at the Umayyads than at re-energizing support for their own troubled dynasty. However, the two caliphs clearly believed that the Umayyads would be credible and effective symbols of  the corrupt and godless alternative to ‘Abbasid rule, whatever its faults. The charges spelled out in these documents neatly summarize the most persistent and important criticisms of Mu‘awiya as a person and a ruler. Al-Mu’tadid’s decree (a revised version of al-Ma’mun’s) is revealing: God cursed the Umayyads through His Prophet orally and by way of revealed scripture thus: ‘… the tree accursed in the Qur’an. We shall frighten them but it only greatly increases their rebelliousness’. [Qur’an 17:60] (Nobody denies that the Umayyads are meant here.) 

When the Prophet saw Abu Sufyan riding on an ass, with Mu‘awiya and his son Yazid driving it he said: ‘May God curse the leader, the rider and the driver!’.

The Messenger of God called for Mu‘awiya to take dictation (to copy down newly revealed verses of revelation as the Prophet recited them) but he refused to do so because he was eating. The Prophet then said, ‘May God never fill his belly!’. 

As a result, Mu‘awiya was always hungry and said, ‘By God, I do not stop eating because I have had enough but only because I can eat no more!’ 

The Messenger of God also said, ‘From this mountain pass, a man from my community is coming up who will be resurrected separately from my people’. Mu‘awiya was the one coming up.

There is also the report that the Messenger of God said, ‘When you see Mu‘awiya on my pulpit, kill him!’. 

Then there is the famous hadith, traced back to the Prophet: ‘Mu‘awiya is in a casket of fire in the lowest layer of Hell, calling out, “O Clement One, O Generous One!” He is given the answer, “Now you believe but before this you sinned and wrought corruption”’. [Qu’ran 10:91] 

There is also his going to war against the most outstanding, earliest and most famous of Muslims, ‘Ali b. Abi Talib. With his false claim, Mu‘awiya contested ‘Ali’s rightful claim. He fought ‘Ali’s helpers with his own erring scoundrels. He attempted what he and his father never ceased attempting, namely ‘to extinguish the light of God’ (Qu’ran 9:32) and deny God’s religion … Mu‘awiya tried to seduce foolish men and confuse the ignorant with his trickery and injustice … Mu‘awiya preferred this fleeting world and denied the enduring other world. He left the ties of Islam and declared it permissible to shed forbidden blood, until in his rebellion … the blood of an uncountable number of the best Muslims was shed. God made it obligatory to curse him for killing, while they could offer no resistance, the best of the men around Muhammad and the men of the second generation (of Muslims) and excellent and religious people, such as ‘Amr b. al-Hamiq and Hujr b. ‘Adi and their like. Furthermore, there is Mu‘awiya’s disdainful attitude toward the religion of God, manifested by his calling God’s servants to (acknowledge) his son Yazid (as heir apparent), that arrogant drunken sot, that owner of cocks, cheetahs and monkeys. With furious threats and frightful intimidation, he forced the best of Muslims to give the oath of allegiance to Yazid, although he was aware of Yazid’s stupidity and was acquainted with his ugliness and viciousness … his drunkenness, immorality and unbelief. [Tabari, XXXVIII, pp. 53–58] 
For Sunnis who were not part of the ‘Abbasid establishment (and these ultimately constituted the majority of Muslims), and talents as an empire-builder (but then al-Mansur was famously hard-nosed and unsentimental). Ultimately, for the Sunnis, Mu‘awiya was not only a Companion of the Prophet but also a scribe of the Qur’an, one of the small group whom Muhammad trusted to receive the dictation of the revelations iph al-Mansur (754–75) respected Mu‘awiya’s political acumen judgments had to be rather more subtle. He had been named governor of Syria (in around 639) by the second caliph, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab,
and was confirmed in that office by the third caliph, ‘Uthman. Mu‘awiya had demonstrated his formidable military, political, and administrative talents for twenty years by the time he became caliph and he restored peace and stability to a Muslim community tormented by five years of civil war.
On the other side of the ledger, the Sunni historical memory recalls that Mu‘awiya’s clan bitterly opposed Muhammad and harassed his followers during his Meccan years and led the war to oust him from Medina. The leader of the opposition in the years between Badr (624) and the occupation of Mecca (630) was Mu‘awiya’s father, Abu Sufyan. Although Mu‘awiya eventually joined the Prophet’s cause, most believed that he did so only after the latter entered Mecca in 630 – a conversion of convenience if ever there was one. Relations between the Banu Umayya and the Banu Hashim (trans. C. E.
Bosworth, 1980).

Umar’s appointment of Mu‘awiya as governor of Syria might suggest that the redoubtable caliph found him
reliable. However, the office came to him only after three earlier appointees had died in rapid succession during a plague epidemic, leaving him the most senior military commander in Palestine. In short, his appointment represented an ad hoc solution to an immediate crisis of leadership. Mu‘awiya remained in office under ‘Uthman partly because this caliph, his second cousin, tried to reinforce his authority over the provinces by appointing members of his own clan as governors. Finally, the Sunni consensus believed, if Mu‘awiya restored peace to the Muslims he had been a major protagonist in the civil war that first sundered the community. Indeed, Mu‘awiya had deliberately provoked the second phase of this struggle by his refusal
to recognize ‘Ali as the lawful successor to the Prophet unless ‘Ali surrendered ‘Uthman’s killers to him for vengeance.
All these threads are nicely woven together in two short but characteristic anecdotes in the Genealogies of the Nobles, a massive historical and biographical compendium composed by Ahmad b. Yahya al-Baladhuri (died 892) at roughly the same time as the decree of the caliph al-Mu‘tadid. One anecdote, recalling the words of a pious critic, emphasizes Mu‘awiya’s worldliness and his indifference to religion; the other, attributed to Mu‘awiya himself, explains in a few terse phrases why he won the day over ‘Ali. As we shall see, judgments concerning  Mu‘awiya’s conduct and character are often more complex but these two reports, with their directness and simplicity, are a good place to begin.
Mu‘awiya said to Ibn al-Kawwa’ al-Yashkuri3: ‘I demand that you tell me under oath what you think of me’. Ibn al-Kawwa’ responded, ‘Since you have compelled me to swear by God’s name, I will tell you that I think that to me you seem to abound in the goods of this world but to be poor in the next life, that you have gifts close at hand but keep the final destination [presumably the next life] far distant, that you are one who
regards the dark as light and the light as dark’.
[Baladhuri, Ansab, LDV, 6–7]

Sunni ambivalence about Mu‘awiya went further than his sometimes dubious political role. It was also a matter of culture. By the ninth century, Islamic society valued piety and religious knowledge above all else (though there was plenty of room for poetry, courtly literature and scientific and philosophic discourse); in this context, Mu‘awiya was problematic. In formal piety and personal conduct, he was acceptable enough (at least he provoked no public scandal) but he was never regarded as religiously learned or even thoughtful and engaged, beyond a superficial level. He believed in God and was publicly correct in his observances but no more. Many regarded him as indifferent to Islam and some noted suspiciously pro-Christian sympathies.

Monday, September 3, 2012

حضرت علی (ع) کے بعد جاہلیت کا دور


مولانا مودودی صاحب اپنی کتاب “تجدید و احیائے دین“ میں فرماتے ہیں کہ حضرت علی (ع) کے بعد جاہلیت اسلام کا لبادہ اوڑھ کر آئی مگر اس لبادہ اسلامی میں موجود جاہلیت کی جو تصویر انہوں نے کھینچی ہے گو کہ اس سے شیخین کو انہوں نے نکال دیا لیکن اگر کھلی آنکھوں سے دیکھا جائے تو شیخین کا کردار بھی بلکل ایسا ہی تھا یعنی نبی پاک (ص) کے دنیا سے پردہ کرتے ہی جاہلیت اسلام کا لبادہ اوڑھ کر آ موجود ہوئی اور نام خلافت رکھا۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔ میرے خیال میں مودودی صاحب کو پھر سے واپس آ کر یہ بات بھی صاف صاف لکھ دینی چاہیے۔




Thursday, August 9, 2012

معاویه بالاتر از حضرت عیسی علیه السلام


أبو سعد آبي (متوفاي421هـ) در محاضرات و صيرفي حنبلي (متوفاي500هـ) در الطيورات مي نويسند :

أن ثلاثة من المشايخ حضروا الجامع . فقال واحد لآخر : جُعلت فداك ، أيهما أفضل : معاوية بن أبي سفيان أم عيسى بن مريم ؟ فقال : لا والله ما أدري . فقال الثالث : يا كشخان ، تقيس كاتب الوحي إلى نبيّ النصارى ؟ .

سه نفر از بزرگان در مسجد جامع نشسته بودند ، يكي از آنان به ديگري گفت : معاويه برتر است يا عيس بن مريم ؟ گفت : نمي دانم ، نفر سوم گفت : كاتب وحي را با پيامبر نصا را مقايسه مي كني ؟

(
الآبي ، أبو سعد منصور بن الحسين ، نثر الدر في المحاضرات ، ج 7 ، ص 209 ، تحقيق : خالد عبد الغني محفوط ، ناشر : دار الكتب العلمية - بيروت /لبنان ، الطبعة : الأولى ، 1424هـ - 2004م . )

(
الصيرفي الحنبلي ، أبو الحسين المبارك بن عبد الجبار الطيوري بن عبد الله ، الطيوريات من انتخاب الشيخ أبي طاهر السلفي ، ج 1 ، ص 113 ، تحقيق : دسمان يحيى معالي ، عباس صخر الحسن ، ناشر : أضواب السلف - الرياض / السعودية ، الطبعة : الأولى ، 1425هـ -2004م .)


تقي الدين حموي (متوفاي838هـ) در طيب المذاق مي نويسد :


ومن ذلك أن رجلاً سأل بعضهم وكان من الحمق على الجانب عظيم فقال أيما أفضل عندك ؟ معاوية أو عيسى بن مريم ؟ فقال ما رأيت سائلا أجهل منك، ولا سمعت بمن قاس كاتب الوحي إلى نبي النصارى !!!

شخصي احمق از ديگري پرسيد : معاويه برتر است يا عيسي بن مريم ؟ گفت : احمق تر از تو نديده ام ؛ چون تا كنون نشنيده ام كسي كاتب وحي را با پيامبر نصارا مقايسه نمايد .

(
الحموي ، تقي الدين أبي بكر بن علي بن عبد الله التقي المعروف ابن حجة ، طيب المذاق من ثمرات الأوراق ، ج 1 ، ص 157 ، ، تحقيق : أبو عمار السخاوي ، ناشر : دار الفتح - الشارقة - 1997م . )

Monday, July 23, 2012

معاویہ تو مہمانوں کا کھانہ بھی تکتہ تھا


لعنتی نے جب بدو کو روکا تو بدوں نے کہا کہ زیبا نہیں کے کوئی شریف آدمی اپ کے دستر خان پے کھانا کھائے آپ مہمانوں کے لقمے تکتے ہیں

فضائل معاویہ اور طائفہ علماء اہلسنت


ہم اس مختصر تحریر میں اہلسنت کے خال المومنین جناب معاویہ بن ھند کے فضائل خصوصہ میں وارد روایات کے حوالہ سے طائفہ علمائے سلف و خلف کے اقوال کو پیش کیا جائے- آج کل ایک مذموم کوشش کے تحت دنیائے وھابیت میں بالعموم اور پاکستان میں دہشتگردوں میں تو یہ نعرہ بڑا عام ہیں کہ

سیاست معاویہ زندہ باد

اس نعرے پر تبصرہ کسی اور دن کا رہا- لیکن آج سردست ہم اس مذموم کوشش کو طشت از بام کرکے ابطال کرنا چاہتے ہیں جس میں مجالس، محافل، مذاکرات، بیانات، دروس وغیرہ میں خصوصی نشست کو معاویہ بن ھند کے لئے مخصوص کرے ان کے مزعوم فضائل مخصوصہ کی تشہیر کی جاتی ہیں

اس سلسلسے میں ہم نے ایک اشارہ دو سال پہلے اپنے ایک تھریڈ میں کیا تھا جس میں ابن تیمیہ کے قول سے استشہاد کیا اور ہمارے برادر عزیز حسن مولائی نے بخاری کے استاد اسحاق بن راہویہ کے قول سے احتجاج کیا

ایک شخص ھوٹ آئس نے ہماری تحریر کا جواب دینا چاہا اور ساتھ نصائح بھی کرنا چاہی- ان کی اس تحریر اور نصحیت کو بندہ احقر بڑی عزت سے نگاہ دیکھتا ہیں لیکن چونکہ ھوت آئس صاحب کی تحریر افراط و تفریط کا حسین مرقع ہیں لہذا اس پر اپنی رائے کا اظہار ہم ضمنی طور پر کرتے چلیں گے جب موقع و محل آئے گا انشاء اللہ

اس تحریر میں بعض اہلسنت کے علماء کے اقوال ذیشان کو پیش کرتے ہیں جس میں انہوں نے فضائل خصائص معاویہ کی نفی کی ہیں- ہم قارئین پر فیصلہ چھوڑیں گے کہ اگر ان کے اندر انصاف کی رمق باقی ہو تو وہ ضرور بالضرور معاویہ بن ھند کے بارے میں اپنی رائے میں تبدیلی لائیں گے بشرط یہ کہ وہ منصف ہو

ایک تنبیہ جو ادھر ضروری ہیں، وہ یہ کہ ادھر معاویہ کے ان عمومی مزعوم فضائل پر ہمارا تبصرہ نہیں ہوگا کیونکہ یہ ہماری بحث کے دائرے سے فی الحال باہر ہیں- لہذاء وہ معاویہ بن ھند کے چاہنے والے جو معاویہ بن ھند کے عمومی فضائل ذکر کرکے ابطال کرنا چاہیں وہ زحمت نہ کرے-
۱،اسحاق بن راہویہ

جس راوی کی جہالت کا حکم معترض نے لگایا تھا حسن مولائی آغا کی پوسٹ کو دیکھ کر تو وہ اپنی جگہ مجھے مناسب دیکھائی دیتا ہیں- مجھے راوی کا تذکر تاریخ بغداد وغیرہ میں ملا مگر توثیق واضح نہیں- البتہ یہ بطور جزم ان علماء اہلسنت نے بطور استشہاد نقل کیا ہیں، جو الزام ہم پر لگایا جاتا ہیں وہی اعتراض ان علماء اہلسنت و سلفی پر ہوتا ہیں:

الف، ملا علی قاری
حوالہ: الأسرار المرفوعة في الأخبار الموضوعة المعروف بالموضوعات الكبرى ج 1 ص 477 المحقق: محمد الصباغ الناشر: دار الأمانة / مؤسسة الرسالة - بيروت

ب، علامہ بدر الدین عینی الحنفی
حوالہ: عمدة القاري شرح صحيح البخاري ج 14 ص 249 الناشر: دار إحياء التراث العربي - بيروت

ج، علامہ ابن قیم
حوالہ: المنار المنيف في الصحيح والضعيف ج ۱ ص 116 المحقق: عبد الفتاح أبو غدة الناشر: مكتبة المطبوعات الإسلامية، حلب

د، علامہ وحید الزمان حیدرآبادی
حوالہ: تیسیر الباری شرح صحیح بخاری، جلد 5، صفحہ 90، ناشر تاج کمپنی لمیڈڈ، باب ذکر معاویہ

ز، علامہ مبارکپوی
حوالہ: تحفة الأحوذي بشرح جامع الترمذي ج ۱۰ ص 231 الناشر: دار الكتب العلمية - بيروت

ہ، علامہ ابن حجر عسقلانی
حوالہ: فتح الباری، جلد 7، صفحہ 104، الناشر: دار المعرفة - بيروت، 1379

اعتراض: آپ نے بھی تک صحت روایت ثابت نہیں کی

جواب: اصل میں،ہم علماء سلف کے طریق پر گامزن ہوں- ایک قاعدہ مشہورہ کو نووی یوں ذکر کرتے ہیں

وَذَلِكَ أَنَّ صِيغَةَ الْجَزْمِ تَقْتَضِي صِحَّتَهُ عَنْ الْمُضَافِ إلَيْهِ فَلَا يَنْبَغِي أَنْ يُطْلَقَ إلَّا فِيمَا صَحَّ وَإِلَّا فَيَكُونُ الْإِنْسَانُ فِي مَعْنَى الْكَاذِبِ عَلَيْهِ


صیغہ جزم سے چیز کو نقل کرنا اس بات کی متقاضی ہیں کہ مضاف الیہ یعنی جس کی طرف نسبت ہو، اس سے صحت کا اثبات ہو- پس اس کا اطلاق اس وقت تک جائز نہیں جب کہ اس شخص سے صحت روایت ثابت نہ ہوجائے، اگر صحت روایت ثابت نہ ہو اور پھر بھی صیغہ جزم کا استعمال ہو تو یہ انسان کا اس شخص پر جھوٹ باندھنے کے مترادف ہیں
-

حوالہ:المجموع شرح المهذب، جلد 1، صفحہ 63، طبع دار الفکر

ہوٹ آئس یقینا برادر عزیز حسن مولائی کو اس معاملہ میں آپ کے علماء سے حسن ظن ہیں ورنہ پھر سب کو جھوٹا کہنا پڑے گا- یہ بات کم سے کم ہمیں برداشت نہیں


اس قاعدہ جلیلہ کو محدثین اثر میں سے علامہ البانی نے بھی نقل کیا ہیں

حوالہ: دفاع عن الحديث النبوي والسيرة، ص 47
۲، طاہر فتنی

اپنی کتاب میں مولف رقم طراز ہیں:

قَالَ لَا يَصح مَرْفُوعا فِي فضل مُعَاوِيَة شَيْء


فضائل معاویہ میں کوئی حدیث مرفوعا یعنی رسول اللہ ص سے صحیح ثابت نہیں

حوالہ: تذكرة الموضوعات ج ۱ ص 100 الناشر: إدارة الطباعة المنيرية

۳، علامہ بدر الدین عینی الحنفی

موصوف رقم طراز ہیں:

فَإِن قلت: قد ورد فِي فضيلته أَحَادِيث كَثِيرَة. قلت: نعم، وَلَكِن لَيْسَ فِيهَا حَدِيث يَصح من طَرِيق الْإِسْنَاد


اگر آپ کہیں کہ معاویہ کی فضیلت میں کثیر احادیث وارد ہوئی ہیں، میں کہوں گا کہ جی بالکل نقل ہوئی ہیں لیکن ان میں سے کوئی ایک بھی سند کے اعتبار سے صحیح نہیں


حوالہ: عمدة القاري شرح صحيح البخاري ج 14 ص 249 الناشر: دار إحياء التراث العربي - بيروت

۴، بخاری

اگرچہ اس پر مناقشہ کیا جاسکتا ہیں- چونکہ علماء اہلسنت و سلفی اس بات پر مختلف آراء رکھتے ہیں، ہم دونوں کی آراء سے واقف ہیں اور زبردستی اپنی رائے مسلط کرنا صواب نہیں سمجھتے- لہذاء ان کی کنایتہ ذکر باب کو علامہ عینی کے قول سے مطابقت دینے کی کوشش کرتے ہیں- یہ ایک واشگاف حقیقت ہیں کہ علامہ بخاری نے اپنی صحیح میں باب ذکر معاویتہ قرار دیا بنسبت باب فضیلتہ معاویہ جیسے کہ اکثر اصحاب نبوی ص کے طریقہ کار کو انتخاب کیا گیا- اس ذکر والے لفظ نے علامہ عینی کو اس بات پر کہنے پر مجبور کیا:

إِن فِيهِ ذكر مُعَاوِيَة، وَلَا يدل هَذَا على فضيلته

اس باب میں معاویہ کا ذکر ہے جو فضیلت پر دال نہیں

حوالہ: عمدة القاري شرح صحيح البخاري ج 14 ص 249 الناشر: دار إحياء التراث العربي - بيروت

 

معاویہ کی بدعتیں

تاریخ کے مطالعہ سے پتہ چلتا ہے کہ معاویہ کی بدعتیں متعدد ہیں : ہم ان میں سے چند کی طرف اشارہ کئے دیتے ہیں:
۱۔ عید اور بقرعید کی نماز میں اذان کہنے کی بدعت معاویہ نے شروع کی
”شافعی“ نے اپنی کتاب ”الام“(۱) میں زہری کی سند سے نقل کیا ہے : پیغمبر اسلام (ص)، ابوبکر، عمر اور عثمان کے زمانے میں عید کی نماز میں اذان نہیں کہی گئی، ان کے بعد شام میں معاویہ نے اس بدعت کو رائج کیا اور اس کے بعدجب ”حجاج“ مدینہ کا گورنر بنا تو مدینہ میں اس نے یہ بدعت رائج کی۔
”ابن حزم“ اپنی کتاب ”المحلی“(۲)میںلکھتا ہے : بنی امیہ نے جو بدعتیں رائج کیں ان میں سے کچھ مندرجہ ذیل ہیں :
الف ۔ نماز عید کیلئے دیر سے جانا ۔
ب ۔ نماز عید سے پہلے خطبہ پڑھنا۔
ج ۔ عید کی نماز میں اذان و اقامت کہنا۔
۲۔ دیت کے مسئلہ میں معاویہ کی بدعت
”ضحاک“ اپنی کتاب ”الدیات“ (۳)میں محمد بن اسحاق سے نقل کرتا ہے : میں نے زہری سے کہا : مجھے کافر ذمی کی دیت کے بارے میں بتاوٴ کہ پیغمبر اکرم(ص)کے زمانے میں اس کی مقدار کتنی تھی؟ کیونکہ اس کے بارے میں اختلاف پیدا ہوگیا ہے۔ اس نے کہا : مشرق و مغرب میں اس مسئلہ کے بارے میں مجھے سے زیادہ علم رکھنے والا کوئی نہیں ہے۔ رسول خدا (صلی اللہ علیہ وآلہ) ، ابوبکر، عمر اور عثمان کے زمانے میں دیت کی مقدار ایک ہزار دینار تھی یہاں تک کہ معاویہ نے مقتول کے اولیاء کو پانچ سو دینار اور بیت المال کے لئے پانچ سو دینار کو معین کیا۔
ابن کثیر ”البدایة والنھایة“(۴)میں لکھتا ہے :
زہری کہتا ہے : شروع سے سنت یہ تھی کہ کافر ذمی کی دیت مسلمان کی دیت کے برابر تھی اور معاویہ پہلا وہ شخص ہے جس نے اس کو آدھی کردی اور آدھی دیت کو اپنے سے مخصوص کرلی(۵)۔
یہ بات بھی قابل ذکر ہے : کافر ذمی کی دیت جیسا کہ زہری نے بیان کیا ہے پیغمبر اکرم(ص) کے زمانے میں ایک ہزار دینار نہیں تھی اور ابوحنیفہ کے علاوہ ان کے آئمہ مذاہب میں سے کسی ایک نے بھی ایک ہزار دینا بیان نہیں کیا ہے ۔ اور سب سے پہلے جس شخص نے اس کو ایک ہزار دینا کیا وہ عثمان تھا(۶)بہر حال اس کام میں معاویہ نے تین بدعتیں ایجاد کیں:
الف۔ اس نے دیت کو ایک ہزار دینار قرار دیا
ب۔ دیت کو مقتول کے ورثاء اور بیت المال کے درمیان تقسیم کیا۔
ج۔ دیت میں سے آدھا حصہ بیت المال کا قرار دیا اس چیز کو فرض کرتے ہوئے کہ ایک ہزار دینار سنت تھی اور بیت المال کا اس میں حصہ تھا۔
۳۔نماز میں مستحبی تکبیروں کو ختم کرنا
کتاب ”شرح الموطا“ میں اس طرح بیان ہوا ہے : ”طبری“ نے ”ابوہریرہ“ سے نقل کیا: سب سے پہلے جس نے نماز سے مستحبی تکبیروں کو ختم کیا ہے وہ معاویہ تھا۔ اور ”ابوعبید“ کی روایت کے مطابق : سب سے پہلا شخص زیاد تھا ۔
”ابن حجر“ نے اپنی کتاب فتح الباری میں (۷) لکھا ہے:
ان دونوں روایتوں میں کوئی منافات نہیں ہے کیونکہ ”زیاد“ نے معاویہ کی پیروی میں تکبیروں کو نہیں کہا ہے اور معاویہ نے عثمان کی پیروی میں تکبیروں کو چھوڑا ہے(۸)۔ لیکن علماء کے ایک گروہ نے اس کو آہستہ کہنے پر حمل کیا ہے۔
اور کتاب ”الوسائل الی مسامرة الاوائل“(۹)میں آیا ہے:
سب سے پہلے جس نے تکبیروں کوترک کیا وہ معاویہ ہے وہ ”سمع اللہ لمن حمدہ“ کہنے کے بعد بغیر تکبیر کہے سجدہ میں چلا جاتا تھا۔
شافعی اپنی کتاب ”الام“(۱۰)میں ”عبید بن رفاعہ“ سے نقل کرتا ہے : معاویہ نے جب مدینہ میں آکر نماز پڑھی تو نماز میں بسم اللہ نہیں پڑھی اور نماز کی حرکات وسکنات میں تکبیروں کو نہیں کہا ۔ نماز کے بعد مہاجر و انصار نے فریاد بلند کی : یا معاویہ !سرقت صلاتک، این بسم اللہ الرحمن الرحیم؟ و این التکبیر اذا خفضت و اذا رفعت؟! ائے معاویہ تم نے نماز سے چوری کی ، بسم اللہ الرحمن الرحیم کہاں گئی؟ نماز میں اٹھتے بیٹھتے وقت کی تکبیریں کہاں گئیں؟!۔ اس نے دوبارہ نماز پڑھائی اور جن چیزوں کا اس پر اعتراض کیا گیا تھا اس کو دوبارہ پڑھا۔
۴۔ نماز عید میں خطبوں کو پہلے پڑھنے کی بدعت
”عبدالرزاق“، ”ابن جریج“ اور زہری“ سے نقل کرتا ہے (۱۱): جس شخص نے سب سے پہلے عید کی نماز میں نماز سے پہلے خطبہ پڑھا وہ معاویہ تھا۔ اور ابن منذر نے ابن سیرین سے نقل کیا ہے : سب سے پہلا شخص جس نے بصرہ میں اس بدعت کو رائج کیا وہ ”زیاد“ تھا۔ ”عیاض“ کہتا ہے : ان دونوں بیانات اور اس بیان میں جس میں مروان کا نام آیا ہے کوئی تعارض نہیں ہے کیونکہ مروان اور زیاد ،معاویہ کے ․․․․․․․کارندوں میں تھے ۔ لہذااس کام کو پہلے معاویہ نے شروع کیا اور انہوں نے اس کی پیروی کی(۱۲)۔
1 ـ کتاب الاُمّ 1 : 208 ]1/235[ .
2 ـ المحلّى : 5 : 82 .
3 ـ الدیات : 50 .
4 ـ البدایة والنهایة 8 : 139 [8/148 ، حوادث سال 60 هـ [ .
5 ـ [قسمت داخل کروشه از منبع اصلى آورده شده است[ .
6 ـ مراجعه شود: الاُمّ ، شافعى 7 : 293 [7 / 321 ;ر . ک : الغدیر 8/240 ـ 248[ .
7 ـ فتح الباری 2 : 215 .
8 ـ احمد در مسند [5/597 ، ح 19380] از عمران این روایت را نقل مى کند.
9 ـ الوسائل إلى مسامرة الأوائل : 15 .
10 ـ کتاب الاُمّ 1 : 94 [1/108[ .
11 ـ المصنّف [3 / 284 ، ح 5646[ .
12 ـ شفیعی شاہرودی، الغدیر سے منتخب اشعار، ص 982 و 986 و 987 و 992

Sunday, April 22, 2012

معاویہ غیر اسلام پر مرا ہے یعنی کافر مرا ہے

کتاب مسائل امام احمد بن حنبل ج 2 ص 154میں ہے
" ابن جعد سے امام احمد روایت کرتے ہیں کہ ابن جعد نے کہا اللہ کی قسم معاویہ کافر ہو کر مرا ہے "
اس کتاب کا محقق بجائے اس کے اسکی سند بحث کرتا کہنے لگا کہ جس نے بھی یہ بات کہی ہے اس نے اپنے اسلام کو خطر میں ڈالا ہے
یہ تو کوئی جواب نہیں ہوا
اس کتاب کا محقق بجائے اس کے اسکی سند بحث کرتا کہنے لگا کہ جس نے بھی یہ بات کہی ہے اس نے اپنے اسلام کو خطر میں ڈالا ہے
یہ تو کوئی جواب نہیں ہوا


معاویہ کی بت فروشی

جہاں ہند جگر خوار کے لال کے کئی رزائل ہیں وہاں اس میں ایک بت کی تجارت بھی ہے جو ہندوستان کے لئے ایکسپورٹ کرتا تھا
طبری نے اپنی کتاب تھذیب میں لکھا ہے :
ابو وائل کہتا ہے کہ : میں مسروق کے ساتھ تھا ایک کشتی گزری جس میں سونے چاندی سے بنے بت تھے جسے معاویہ، تجارت کے لئے ہندوستان بھیج رہا تھا تب مسروق نے کہا :اگر مجھے یقین ہوتا کہ یہ مجھے قتل کر دینگے تو میں یہ پوری کشتی کو غرق کر دیتا لیکن میں آزمائش اور تشدد سے ڈرتا ہوں ۔
متن

حدثنا محمد بن بشار ، قال : حدثنا عبد الرحمن ، قال : حدثنا سفيان ، عن الأعمش ، عن أبي وائل ، قال : كنت مع مسروق بالسلسلة ، فمرت عليه سفينة فيها أصنام ذهب وفضة ، بعث بها معاوية إلى الهند تباع ، فقال مسروق : « لو أعلم أنهم يقتلوني لغرقتها ، ولكني أخشى الفتنة »
تهذيب الآثار وتفصيل الثابت عن رسول الله من الأخبار ج 3 ص 241 أبي جعفر محمد بن جرير بن يزيد الطبري
سنة الولادة 224هـ/ سنة الوفاة 310هـ تحقيق محمود محمد شاكر الناشر مطبعة المدني سنة النشر مكان النشر القاهرة
انساب الاشراف بلاذری ج 2 ص 122میں اس طرح ہے
حدثنا يوسف وإسحاق قالا: جرير عن الأعمش عن أبي وائل قال: كنت مع مسروق بالسلسلة فمرت به سفائن فيها أصنام من صفرٍ تماثيل الرجال، فسألهم عنها فقالوا: بعث بها معاوية إلى أرض السند والهند تباع له، فقال مسروق: لو أعلم أنهم يقتلونني لغرقتها، ولكني أخاف أن يعذبوني ثم يفتنوني، والله ما أدري أي الرجلين معاوية، أرجل قد يئس من الآخرة فهو يتمتع من الدنيا أم رجل
زين له سوء عمله


اس روایت کی سند بالکل صحیح ہے 
عبد الرحمن سے مراد عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ مَهْدِيٍّ یہ اور سفیان ، محمد بن بشار 
بخاری کے مشائخ ہیں 
بخاری کبھی عبد الرحمن کو ابن المھدی کہتا ہے


نیچےصحیح بخاری سے ایک روایت درج کر رہا ہوں جس میں ہماری روایت کے سب چہار افراد ہیں


37 - باب: ليس منا من ضرب الخدود .



حدثنا محمد بن بشار: حدثنا عبد الرحمن: حدثنا سفيان، عن الأعمش، عن عبد الله بن مرة، عن مسروق، عن عبد الله رضي الله عنه،

عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم قال: (ليس منا من ضرب الخدود، وشق الجيوب، ودعا بدعوى الجاهلية).

Saturday, April 21, 2012

Who was Muawiya ibn Abu Sufyan?

 The story of Ashura and the great sacrifice made by Imam Hussain (a.s.) to save the religion of Islam was a classic tale of good versus evil. The evil in these events was personified by Yazid ibn Muawiya (may Allah curse him), a man who was simply a despicable human, let alone a so-called Muslim.

His reign as "caliph" was short but painful. In his first year of rule he commanded his forces to kill the grandson of the Holy Prophet, along with his family and friends and in the second year he attacked the Holy Kaa'ba and set fire to it. He was a power-hungry, selfish and arrogant man but tracing through history, he was not the real brains behind the attempt to destroy Islam, the real brains was his father - Muawiya ibn Abu Sufyan. Of the trio of the founding Umayyad fathers, Abu Sufyan, Muawiya and Yazid, Muawiya is the most significant, the most influential and most cunning.

Sunnis lay a lot of credit on Muawiya's door. They have a lot invested in him. They don't really take note of Abu Sufyan and condemn the actions of Yazid, on the whole (apart from fools like Dr. Zakir Naik). Muawiya on the other hand is treated with a lot of respect. They call him Hazrat Muawiya - rasiallahu-anhu (may Allah be pleased with him) amongst other respectful titles. He has been bizarrely sanctified by the Ahle Sunnah over the centuries, his reputation has been shrouded in myths, legends and propaganda.

During Muharrum I heard an excellent lecture about Muawiya. From my notes and further research on the man, I want to explore who Muawiya was, we need to be aware of who he was and what he represented. The lecturer carefully explored his real record, the truth about his life and deeds and ambitions. We have to know who these people are in order to represent our faith in a better light and even enlighten our brethren in the Ahle Sunnah about the truth behind Muawiya.

The Ahle Sunnah like to give him three main claims to fame. Firstly, he was a great companion of the Holy Prophet. Looking at history, he was in the Holy Prophet's midst only for the last 2 years of the Prophet's life. Any hadith claiming words of praise about Muawiya from the Holy Prophet have been fabricated by Muawiya himself. He was a great propaganda machine and spent much of his time in power creating new hadiths about himself and Bani Ummaya. He also created other hadiths trying to discredit Imam Ali (a.s.) and Bani Hashim in an attempt to legitimise his rule.

The reality is that he was not a great companion of the Holy Prophet, and the Prophet enunciated not one word of praise or merit about Muawiya. Many Sunni scholars have come to this conclusion in their research, including Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, Jalaluddin Al-Suyuti and Abdul-Haqq Dehlavi who all attest to there being no hadiths in praise of Muawiya in their books.

The Ahle-Sunnah also believe Muawiya to have been a legitimate ruler, caliph of the Muslims. He obtained the Caliphate by ousting the 2nd Holy Imam, Imam Hasan (a.s.) through bribery and blackmail of Imam Hasan's supporters. He negotiated a peace treaty with Imam Hasan (a.s.) and then systematically broke every single article of the treaty. He broke the central condition of the treaty - regarding succession to his rule, by appointing his cursed son Yazid as Caliph.

He is, in effect, Islam's first tyrant. He was the man who created structures of kinship and autocracy. He dug the roots of tyranny, terror and totalitarianism that defaces Islam today. Famous Sunni scholar, Abul Ala Maududi, in his 1973 book "Caliphate and Kingship", outlines in detail the numerous ways in which Muawiya enriched himself at the expense of the people, how corrupt he was, how many companions and innocent Muslims he killed and how he amassed both power and wealth. He turned the Caliphate into a Kingship. (After all that criticism, Maududi still managed to end the book with "Hazrat Muawiya, (r.a.)"!!)

If he is a true Caliph and deserved the title, why is he not one of the Khulafa-e-Rashideen - the four rightly guided Caliphs? Why does it end with Imam Ali (a.s.), why wasn't Muawiya added to this list? They know the truth, but cannot bring themselves to admit as much. The irony is that how could he be a great Caliph when some of his own companions refused to pray behind him? A companion of Abu Huraira, no friend of the Shia, claims in Sirat-e-Halabiya that "On the plains of Siffin, Abu Huraira would pray Salat behind Ali, but would go and eat with Muawiya. Someone asked why he did this, to which he replied "Food with Muawiya is better, but Salat under Ali is better.""

Muawiya belonged to Deviated Party

Hadith Number 3800 and 3801(Sahih Muslim):
This hadith  from Sahih Muslim has confirmed for those Muslims, who praise Muawiya ibn Abu Sufyan, that not only Muawiya ibn Abu Sufyan, but his whole party were deviated from the right path and had transgressed, because they had fought Imam Ali during the battle of siffeen, killing many innocent Muslims, especially, the killing of Ammar ibn Yassir, who sided with Imam Ali during the batrle of siffeen.

The Prophet (SAAW) said to Ammar ibn Yassir, "Rejoice Ammar, the transgression party shall kill you",
and Ammar ibn Yassir was killed in the battle of siffeen by Muawiya nad his trangressed party, or army.

English version, History of Tabari, Volumne 17, page 64 and 65:
..."stick to the party of Ibn Summayah (Ammar ibn Yassir), for i heard to Prophet (SAAW) saying, "the party that swerves fromt the right path will kill him, and his last sustenance will be milk mixed with water.""

http://books.google.com.au/books?id=8NplgRul0nMC&pg=PA64&dq=The+Killing+of+%60Ammar+b.+Yasir&hl=en&ei=I5yOTZPEJ8WlcO21kIEK&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=The%20Killing%20of%20%60Ammar%20b.%20Yasir&f=false

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Perfect Proofs that Mu'awiya Abused Imam Ali (as)!!

There is an increasing tendency among Sunnis to deny the fact that Mu'awiya, their master, used to abuse and curse Imam Ali (as). The point is: once it is proved that he did either of the two, his kufr (disbelief) is proved! This is because of this hadith:

"Whoever abuses Ali has abused me."

Shaykh Abu Ishaq al-Hawayni in his Tahdhib al-Khasais, p. 76, No. 86 states after recording it:

Its chain is sahih.

The Salafi hadithist, al-Daani ibn Muneer Aali al-Zaawee in his tahqiq of the hadith in Kitab al-Khasais states:

Its chain is hasan.

The hadith is also recorded in Musnad Ahmad 2/735 No. 1011. Its annotator, Wasiyullah Muhammad Abbas states:

Its chain is sahih.

Imam al-Suyuti has declared it sahih in his Jami' al-Sagheer 529 No. 8736. 

Imam al-Munawi in his tahqiq of Jami al-Sagheer 2/817 also declares the hadith sahih.

Ibn al-Jazri in his Manaqib Usd al-Ghalib 20 has also declared it sahih.

When we look into the authoritative Sunni and Salafi sources, we discovered that Mu'awiya is proved to have, at least, abused Imam Ali (as) and also ordered others to do so.

Ibn Taymiyyah in his Minhaj al-Sunnah vol. 5, p. 42 states:
وأما حديث سعد لما أمره معاوية بالسب فأبى فقال ما منعك أن تسب علي بن أبي طالب فقال ثلاث قالهن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فلن أسبه لأن يكون لي واحدة منهن أحب إلي من حمر النعم الحديث فهذا حديث صحيح رواه مسلم في صحيحه وفيه ثلاث فضائل لعلي

As for the hadith of Sa'd, when Mu'awiya ORDERED him to abuse Ali, and he declined, and Mu'awiya asked him "What stops you from abusing Ali ibn Abu Talib?" and he answered "The Prophet said three things about him ....

Shaykh al-Albani in his Sahih Sunan Ibn Majah vol. 1, p. 26, number 118 records:
حدثنا علي بن محمد حدثنا أبو معاوية حدثنا موسى بن مسلم عن ابن سابط وهو عبد الرحمن عن سعد بن أبي وقاص قال قدم معاوية في بعض حجّاته ، فدخل عليه سعد فذكروا علياً فنالَ منه ، فغضب سعد وقال : تقول هذا في لرجل سمعتُ رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم يقول فيه : من كنتُ مولاه فعليّ مولاه . وسمعته يقول أنت مني بمنزلة هارون من موسى إلا أنه لا نبي بعدي . وسمعته يقول لأعطين الراية اليوم رجلا يحب الله ورسوله.؟)

Narrated Sa'd ibn Abi Waqas:

Mu'awiya returned from one of his confrontations, and Sa'd entered upon him. They mentioned Ali and he verbally attacked him. Thus Sa'd got angry, saying: "You said that about a man about whom I heard the Messenger of Allah said: 'Whosoever I am his master, Ali too is his master'. I also heard him say: 'O Ali, your rank in relation to me is like that of Harun to Musa except that there will be no prophet after me'. He also said (about Ali): I will give the flag today tom a man who loves Allah and His Messenger?".

Al-Albani says:

Sahih.

Conclusion: So, dear Sunni Brothers don't blame shias, it is found in your books that Muawiya used to abuse Ali. And whoever abuse Ali abuse me , says Prophet(s.a.w). Still you would respect such a man!!!. Whom do you love more Prophet(s.a.w)  OR Muawiya!!!

Hidden Agenda of Mu'awiya


Mutraf bin Mughira bin Sho`ba says:
"I accompanied my father Mughira to see Mu`awiya. My father visited him every day and praised him very much on his return.
When he came back one night he was very sad and he did not even take his dinner. On my having enquired about the reason for his sadness he said:
My son!Tonight I have come after meeting the most evil person.
On my having enquired as to who he was he said:
"I told Mu`awiya in seclusion: You have achieved all your desires. It will now be in the fitness of things if you behave with the people kindly. You have grown old now. You should behave well with Bani Hashim who are your kith and kin.
There is no reason for you to be afraid of them now!
Mu`awiya replied: `Never! Never! The man belonging to the Family of Taym (Abu Bakr) became caliph. When he died he was no longer talked about. Now he is called only `Abu Bakr' by the people.
After him Umar became caliph and ruled promptly for ten years. With his death he also ceased to be talked about and people now call him `Umar'.
Then our brother Uthman became the caliph. He belonged to the noblest family. He ruled justly but when he died he too ceased to be talked about.
However, the name of the son of Bani Hashim (i.e. Muhammad) is announced five times during the day and night (i.e. everyone says: I acknowledge that Muhammad is the prophet of God). Now what else can be done with his name except that I should destroy it Completely''
.
(Murujuz Zahab, vol. 2, page 241).(Voice of Human Justice Pg.230)
Courtesy: http://www.shiaforums.com/vb/f195/hiden-agenda-muawiya-l-11459/#post39949